Page 49 of 191
Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:22 am
by Maglok
Didn't Reapers get pulled from the latest build?
Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:10 am
by Whiplash!
yup they're out, and people are still complaining. I'd take colossus over it personally, the wall walking is more valuable.
Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:13 am
by Xenon
Gah, the "reaper" vs "reaver" typo problem strikes again! Maybe one reason why reavers might get removed...
Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:40 am
by Lavarinth
Reapers are out!? Then what's in?? Oh wait- I'm sure Maglok meant Reavers.

(I'd prefer Firebats over Reapers)
Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:42 pm
by RazorclawX
Taeradun wrote:
Warcraft III modding never caught on with me because Warcraft III was fucking shit, with all this lame crap like elves and shit. If it had Protoss
then I would've taken up Warcraft III modding
Semantic nonsense; Protoss ARE Elves, just as Zerg are Demons and Terrans are... well, Humans. Starcraft has more in common with Fantasy than it ever did with Science Fiction; just because it takes place in space doesn't make it Science Fiction. Even something that isn't thought highly as Science Fiction as Stargate SG-1 is more Science Fiction than Starcraft.
Ancient race that leaves a bunch of overpowered artifacts lying around = Protoss and Elves. They get used for practically the same thing in every story.
Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:15 pm
by Taeradun
lol
Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:36 am
by chris
Lavarinth wrote:
Reapers are out!? Then what's in?? Oh wait- I'm sure Maglok meant Reavers.

(I'd prefer Firebats over Reapers)
what the hell!?
they pulled reapers out of the game!?
why?
Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:44 am
by Xenon
Did you quote that without even reading all of it?

Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:47 am
by Maglok
That explains so much, I didn't put the connection between reaver and reaper and a not-to-be-named SC newssite actually typed Reaper in the newspost.

Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:05 am
by Lavarinth
chris wrote:
Lavarinth wrote:
Reapers are out!? Then what's in?? Oh wait- I'm sure Maglok meant Reavers.

(I'd prefer Firebats over Reapers)
what the hell!?
they pulled reapers out of the game!?
why?
...

Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 6:18 am
by Fatburger666
You should stop talking, chris.

Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 1:56 am
by chris
Maglok wrote:
That explains so much, I didn't put the connection between reaver and reaper and a not-to-be-named SC newssite actually typed Reaper in the newspost.
lol!
I didn't realise until now that reaver and reaper have almost the same spelling

Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:30 am
by Fatburger666
You crack me up, man.

Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 7:42 am
by chris
right, I completely analyzed the protoss teck tree and the terran teck tree.
allow me to express my personal opinion:
protoss:
seems ok. although it would be cooler if the mother ship has a teck tree akin to that of the arbiter, in other words, to make a mother ship you must have a templar archives and a in order to make the mothership.
terran: hmmm, its funny to see the detection system being removed from the turrets and being made into an independent building. I wonder is the photon cannon will also be stripped of its detection abilities. now WHY ON EARTH CAN'T REAPERS BE MADE IN THE BARACKS

.it makes no sence to force them to be built in some seperate building when they are infantry. I do believe the merc haven thing should eb kept....its just that the reapers shouldn't be built directly from it.
moving on....uhm what the hell? banshee nomad AND siege tank can all be built with the teck lab?! ok ok...I'll just build a teck lab and forget about all the other buildings then

. one final note: from what I see, the star base serves absolutely no other purpose than to waste resources on.
summary:
the protoss are almost complete
the terrans need some work.
the zerg....who? lol
Re: StarCraft II Official! (Pictures)
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:36 am
by AA7Dragoon
I am a little surprised by the tech trees.
Doesn't seem like you need to build more buildings than SC1?