Campaign Creations

If I had to do it all over again, I would keep 4 DTs but give them one kill a night. GOOD THING I DON'T HAVE TO DO IT ALL OVER AGAIN

I AM FREEEEEEEEEE

in the end my final 4 suspects starting with dow was correct and we probably couldve won but hehehehe

Well, we knew you had to be the Warrier Man X whenever you killed SF's vote and did not kill any votes the round before, simply because you WERE the deciding vote.  Then we just had to make sure that we disrupted another person that could keep us from killing you, so we chose RCCola, but, atm, I can't remember what tipped his profession off...

Yeah, I'm sorry for the lack of activity I won't play next time, didn't realize I'd be getting so busy like that.

It's okay.  Everyone makes mistakes.  We probably won't do time limits anymore.  My question is, what made you vote for me?

So there goes Auir City. (I felt I got carried away a bit at the end)

lawl @ Shadowflare. I knew somethnig was amiss! I actually wanted to vote for you earlier on in the game out of sheer hunchyness.

What I want to know is, why did Warrior Man X (Murdermasterx) save mAc Chaos from one of the earlier lynchings?

[I don't Understand what I'm Saying]

It's lucky I did get saved, otherwise I wouldn't have been able to piece everyone together.

Actually, another choice would have been to take down one of the votes for Lav and then it would have been no lynch, since there would have been twice as many votes for no lynch than to lynch any certain person.

i didnt want a no lynch which is why i voted for lav

i was gonna try to kill both of them honestly but good thing that didnt work out

the vote for mac i slashed was just for shits to demonstrate the mighty power of my Holy Hell Hope Sword

So you wanted to kill two people who accused each other of being Dark Templar, knowing one WAS NOT?

Wow. No wonder we lost.

Lavarinth wrote: So you wanted to kill two people who accused each other of being Dark Templar, knowing one WAS NOT?

Wow. No wonder we lost.

the way you were going at it cast a shadow on both of you, i thought one was dt and the other was zealot and its most certainly worth the trade off that early especially how things were going with observers.

something that didnt happen had no effect on the outcome. your self inflicted early death didnt help though

also zealots voting to lynch someone that they knew lead the only successful DT lynch didnt help

also losing a zealot before the game started because someone thought itd be cute to post a screenshot of their pm didnt help

Wow. No wonder we lost.

You did make yourself look fairly suspect, jumping to a lynch vote like that, Lav.  If I hadn't detected you the night prior and discovered you to be innocent, I might've voted against you too.

That reminds me... how dare you Dark Templar cast your Disruption Web on me twice!!

Lav DEFINITELY should have said he was an Arbiter that day when he was going to be lynched. I don't get why people are so reluctant to admit their roles, like Lav being an Observer last game. "Just trust me" NEVER works.

Milldawg wrote: Lav DEFINITELY should have said he was an Arbiter that day when he was going to be lynched. I don't get why people are so reluctant to admit their roles, like Lav being an Observer last game. "Just trust me" NEVER works.

I didn't get a chance to, when I was going to it was too late when I logged in, haha.

And "just trust me" works if you've never said "trust me" and broken that trust. And noting my history in these games, I haven't broken that saying haha.

mAc Chaos wrote: It's okay.  Everyone makes mistakes.  We probably won't do time limits anymore.  My question is, what made you vote for me?

Pure boredom, and everyone else was so I didn't really care.