Campaign Creations

Lavarinth wrote: Shadow, he let it go because it's 2 against 1 DT and =P Obviously. If it was 2 DT against 1, then there'd be no reason.

1 DT?  Just a moment ago both you and Taer were saying you were the remaining two DT.  Or am I mistaken?  lol

Bwahaha!  See?  If only I had more time to spread the SEEDS OF DOUBT, Yellowtown would have burned!

Yeah, I was really the last one.  mAc and Thal were the others.

lol, so all 3 of you just decided to try to confuse me on the outcome after it ended?

Yeah, as an not-impartial observer (but not that kind of Observer), I gotta admit that the rush through Day 3 was unfair.  I think mAc and Aek should have had a chance to vote/defend themselves before Mill dropped the hammer.  Just kinda annoying because Day 2 dragged on for so long waiting for one more vote (which allowed opinions to be changed), while Day 3 was "majority's voted!  BAM!"

Oh, well.  It also means that round 3 will start sooner and I SHALL LIVE AGAIN!  So it's not all bad.

Taer wrote: also this is from like yesterday or whatever

(06:26:55) Jonny Milldawg: so uh
(06:27:01) Jonny Milldawg: i'm not sure where you have been
(06:27:10) Jonny Milldawg: but the mafia game is stagnant because everyone is waiting for your vote :\
(06:27:23) Jonny Milldawg: i wanted to give you time in case something had come up
(06:27:28) Jonny Milldawg: but i think i am going to have to just call the deadline
(06:27:40) Taeradun3000: o shit
(06:28:45) Taeradun3000: meh tl;dr

...

(06:30:09) Jonny Milldawg: yeah it is like 10 pages :X
(06:30:26) Jonny Milldawg: basically, tipereth isg oing to be killed, but if you vote thalraxal, they'll both die
(06:30:31) Taeradun3000: lol

*votes thrax to kill two people just for lols*

You killed me for sheer entertainment value?  You bastard!  I'd be annoyed except that I'd be tempted to do the exact same thing if I was in your position.

In the end, he made the right decisions.  That jerk.

ShadowFlare wrote: lol, so all 3 of you just decided to try to confuse me on the outcome after it ended?

Naturally!

So my logic was all correct then?

You killed me because I was pretty much a confirmed innocent, right?  Or was it just out of spite because I led the charge? lol

Shadow, I was joking.

Observations:
Day 1: Shadow - Zealot
Day 2: Thal - DT
Day 3: mAc - DT
Day 4: Aek - DT

I'm just that good.

Actually, they're just that obvious. Defending Thal was their downfall as only TWO people were defending him, that made it suspicious.

ShadowFlare wrote: So my logic was all correct then?

You killed me because I was pretty much a confirmed innocent, right?  Or was it just out of spite because I led the charge? lol

Because it seemed the most unexpected thing for me to do.  I was hoping I could convince Taer to vote Lav.  And it looks like I did... just after he already voted me.

But yeah, you were right spot-on.  Well done, I must say.

Lavarinth wrote: Actually, they're just that obvious. Defending Thal was their downfall as only TWO people were defending him, that made it suspicious.

Honestly, I probably would have defended Thal even if I was a Zealot.  I seem to have a habit of doing that.

Aekenon wrote: Because it seemed the most unexpected thing for me to do.  I was hoping I could convince Taer to vote Lav.  And it looks like I did... just after he already voted me.

But yeah, you were right spot-on.  Well done, I must say.

He probably decided to believe my logic that if he was not a Dark Templar then neither was Lavarinth.

Granted, your logic was the only one out there.  I just didn't post in time... such is my folly!

Aekenon wrote: Granted, your logic was the only one out there.  I just didn't post in time... such is my folly!

You were screwed from the moment you sided with mAc. If it wasn't for the "investigate mAc" stuff, I would of investigated you since it was obvious mAc was one and only pointed you out sooner.

What connected me with mAc, anyway?  Other than the fact that we voted for Tip.  Or was that it?

Good game.  Darn!  We almost had it.

I don't think it was siding with Thal that led to our downfall.  Although I think he was too aggressive in the beginning and drew untowards attention, but I managed to lead everyone to Tipereth, so that was not the game losing factor.  It got turned into a bonus.  We were clinking our glasses when Mucky said he made a mistake.  But then the day dragged on... and on... and on some more, and then everyone had time to exhaust every possible option when they would have already killed Tipereth by then, and then it was over.

I'll get you guys next time.  I'll never be defeated!

Also, curse you, Taeradun.  I knew that was going to happen.   I KNEW IT!  I saw like fifteen pages of discussion and was like "no way he's going to read all that, along with my CLEVER RUSES."  If only it was anyone else but you with that tiebreaking vote.

I thought people would be more suspicious that I would be a Dark Templar again.  Not only me, but Thal.  Not only us, but AT THE SAME TIME.  And then Lavarinth being the Observer twice in a row too.  What were the odds.

Aekenon wrote: What connected me with mAc, anyway?  Other than the fact that we voted for Tip.  Or was that it?

You supported him.

mAc: It was Thal that led to your downfall. I started the suspicion on you only at that factor since we had all decided Thal was guilty.

Yeah, my strategy was to be more aggresive and hasty than I was last round, to try and make people think I'd changed roles.  It backfired

Oh, and good game everyone!  Looking forward to next round!