Re: Understanding North Korea
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:04 am
As far as I'm aware, North Korea was already trying to piss off over 18 countries with threats of nuking any opposers of the supreme power without secret bomb blasts.
https://www.campaigncreations.org/forum/
https://www.campaigncreations.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6766
The threat of launching nukes to any country in the world is more or less an initiation to a Mexican standoff, since no one would be willing to attack the other in fear of retaliating nuke fire. This actually gives NK an immediate advantage unlike the Marathon bombing, which could "pissing off" countries but can't really do much else...Lavarinth wrote:As far as I'm aware, North Korea was already trying to piss off over 18 countries with threats of nuking any opposers of the supreme power without secret bomb blasts.
This is why I hate conspiracy theories. To be honest let just stop all these pointless discussion and wait for the truth to arrive...I'm not sure if I've veered a little off-topic here.
To be fair nothing I've stated here has been any sort of conspiracy theory. There was even sourced factual information. Also the discussion, albeit pointless to the actual outcome, is valuable in so far as it's discussion of real world and influential topics. It has value because we're helping shape discussion over influential, important, even meaningful topics between friends. Maybe someone even feels the need to discuss it as a method to cope. It's even possible that these discussions will at some point shape the real world application of some policies; that is whenever Lavarinth or Hercanic vie to become President of the United States or other elected officials.mark_009_vn wrote:This is why I hate conspiracy theories. To be honest let just stop all these pointless discussion and wait for the truth to arrive...I'm not sure if I've veered a little off-topic here.
If their focus is to build something, aim south, and make minimum distance. You wouldn't need something too sophisticated. Lots of bottle rockets. Lots. This isn't rocket science. Oh, wait...wibod wrote:Also it's thought that Best Korea's nukes are in line with the Little Boy and Fat Man. You can't put that shit on bottle rockets.
Because said plane is from the 60s and will be seen on the ground being prepped and then bombed on the strip or blown out of the sky before it's anywhere near the south.Hercanic wrote:Who needs sophisticated missile guidance technology when you can just strap that shit to a low-tech plane? It'd take a suicidal pilot, but that's not exactly impossible to find...
His focus might have been to act so bat shit insane for the right amount of time to entrench his power over armed forces in North Korea. To strengthen his rule and put to rest a remaining risk that his subordinates, who would in fact be in control of each branch of North Korea's armed forces, see him as a weak leader in the face of pressure from foreign nations. Might be, might back down once all of his generals are on the same page realizing the fallacious nature of war on that peninsula. I could see it. Maybe they're just insane. Who knows.DrumsofWar wrote:On the bright side, this may convince Kim Jong-Un in the long term to pursue a slow burn reform policy. He's doubtlessly seen how shitty his regime's military readiness compared to the MUCH improved response time of his neighbors to any shenanigans.
A ballistic missile poses a greater risk because of how difficult those can be to track and take down safely depending on which stage it is in its flight. Even in only considering their incredible speeds compared to traditional plane deliveries (example: LGM-30 Minuteman which travels at certain stages attaining speeds of as high as MACH23). Also, there has been no shortage of professional criticism from defense officials as to how efficacious the MIM-104 Patriot missile defenses are in practice. The risk of a conventional bomber being used is still real; but it wouldn't have stealth capabilities, would be easier to intercept, and might not result in accidental detonation depending on how it was armed for flight.Hercanic wrote:Who needs sophisticated missile guidance technology when you can just strap that shit to a low-tech plane? It'd take a suicidal pilot, but that's not exactly impossible to find...
Jeez. It isn't even a full moon. When did we miss the congregation of crazies convention.DrumsofWar wrote:Thankfully, there hasn't been a link between North Korea and what's going on this week. An arrest was made in the ricin envelope mailings in Louisiana today so there may not be a link between the bombing and the mailings either.
We'll see... We'll see, an SA-2 can still took down a B-52 even when it's guidance fins were improvised out of car wheels and mine shrapnel let alone a Fat Man with rockets. We'll see.. We'll see....wibod wrote:Also it's thought that Best Korea's nukes are in line with the Little Boy and Fat Man. You can't put that shit on bottle rockets.
My experiences tells me 9 out of 10 it's going to be bad...To be fair nothing I've stated here has been any sort of conspiracy theory. There was even sourced factual information. Also the discussion, albeit pointless to the actual outcome, is valuable in so far as it's discussion of real world and influential topics. It has value because we're helping shape discussion over influential, important, even meaningful topics between friends. Maybe someone even feels the need to discuss it as a method to cope. It's even possible that these discussions will at some point shape the real world application of some policies; that is whenever Lavarinth or Hercanic vie to become President of the United States or other elected officials.
You'll have to be a communist to know how a communist thinks. Long story sort, I think he's just really, really hot blooded.Maybe they're just insane. Who knows.
Have you seen the Internet? Conspiracy theories multiply faster after any major news event faster than legitimate information can.Dread wrote: Jeez. It isn't even a full moon. When did we miss the congregation of crazies convention.
First rule of communism: Never, ever, ever, ever, ever admit that you're wrong. I know it too well.DrumsofWar wrote: As for Mr. Kim, probably the biggest mystery is exactly how much leverage he has over his generals to pursue whatever his real agenda is. Some analysts seemed to suggest that the generals are more rational and that it might be better that they be in charge. I think it's a mistake to prefer the stability of an military oligarchy to the current state of affairs even if everyone's afraid of dealing with the political fallout of aiding 40 million+ North Koreans with weak infrastructure, little jobs, and famine-like conditions.
I hope you have a citation for that SA-2 story!mark_009_vn wrote:We'll see... We'll see, an SA-2 can still took down a B-52 even when it's guidance fins were improvised out of car wheels and mine shrapnel let alone a Fat Man with rockets. We'll see.. We'll see....wibod wrote:Also it's thought that Best Korea's nukes are in line with the Little Boy and Fat Man. You can't put that shit on bottle rockets.
Fog. Hanger. Underground tunnels.wibod wrote:Because said plane is from the 60s and will be seen on the ground being prepped and then bombed on the strip or blown out of the sky before it's anywhere near the south.