Page 2 of 5
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:06 pm
by Xelxiuz
As opposed to Queen and Drone. Blizzard never had creativity, they had polish.
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:02 pm
by Thalraxal
Xelxiuz wrote:
As opposed to Queen and Drone. Blizzard never had creativity, they had polish.
Queen and Drone are logical names, however, they're related to their functions in the Swarm. But roach? Meaningless! Generic bug-alien name!
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:45 am
by Xelxiuz
Roach = Cockroach = Bugs that survive nukes. Only two steps more to make the link.
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:03 am
by Taeradun
and they burn your fingers if you don't use a clip
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:05 am
by Thalraxal
Xelxiuz wrote:
Roach = Cockroach = Bugs that survive nukes. Only two steps more to make the link.
I know what they're referencing with the name, Xel. 'Roach' is still a terrible name for a unit. I'm sure they could have a spent a whole fifteen minutes and come up with a better name than that.

Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:30 pm
by Lavarinth
Roach is indeed a terrible name. Might as well call it Regenling.
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:34 pm
by Taeradun
Cocklisk
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:04 pm
by Xelxiuz
That's your 15 minutes worth of answer =[
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:16 pm
by IskatuMesk
Taeralisk wrote:
Cocklisk
Has new bonus damage type "Penetrating"
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm
by Thalraxal
Taeralisk wrote:
Cocklisk
Xelxiuz wrote:
That's your 15 minutes worth of answer =[
And it's still better than 'Roach'.
I think I'll go with Lav's Regenling for now. From this day forward, I shall only refer to the Roach as the Regenling, and no one will have any clue what I'm talking about!
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:04 pm
by Taeradun
Dung beetle
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:42 am
by Taeradun
wait wait, I got it
how about "Roachlisk"
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:27 am
by Hercanic
Hydr-a-lisk
Mut-a-lisk
Ultr-a-lisk
So if anything, it'd have to be a Roachalisk.
Honestly, though, I'm fine with the name Roach. The monosyllabic word is short, simple, and connotates everything the unit is. A real roach is sneaky, able to slip between cracks and pop up in your home when you least suspect it. The skittering bug is vile, but a hearty survivor.
When you are naming something, you want to evoke an emotion and (particularly in an RTS) communicate as much as possible about the unit in a simple way. Very few unit names in Starcraft are completely made-up. They usually have a basis in something, which communicates its role, function, or flavor. The Carrier, Observer, Larva, Overlord, Queen, Siege Tank, Battlecruiser, etc, are all plain English words. A name like Firebat, which is Starcraft's own term, still has a very overt meaning with the prefix fire-.
In short, I don't see the name Roach as differing from Starcraft's established conventions.
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:53 am
by Xenon
I still like
Cheese-Child's list of Zerg units.
Drone
Worker
Soldier
Queen
King
Ace
Dog
Angry Dog
Mutant Dog
Angry Mutant Dog
Dogdralisk
Elephant
Elephantlisk
DefiledSlimeBeastLord
Attackdralisk
Beastolisk
Liskdralisk
Liskmastah Z
Giant Blimpolisk
Satan
"This is a picture of one of the ham monster units, the meatloafdralisk. Like all other units of that race they are big and fat and ugly and made entirely out of meat."
Re: Patch 3
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 5:45 am
by Death_Wing
Wow, that was just too much for me. Let me go lie down.