That is true, but I still find it just too awkwardly timed with the release of the "next big thing" (StarCraft 2) over a period of 3-5 years (yeah, I went there). But then again, the last three products from Blizzard were WarCraft 3, WarCraft 3 Expansion, and World of WarCraft followed by its expansions.Desler wrote: If StarCraft is the next universe to go big, it would further explain them releasing SC2 in 3 big expansions. That way they add a lot of lore, characters, etc to the mythos, giving a 'World of StarCraft' a lot of material to work with.
WarCraft 3 Release Date: July 3, 2002
Frozen Throne Release Date: July 1, 2003
World of WarCraft Release Date: November 23, 2004
(With a madness of beta testing before 2004 during WarCraft 3.) So those release dates wouldn't surprise me, now that I think about it, if it was StarCraft, especially with a Lead Producer already familiar with the franchises. As well as how Desler mentioned, the more expansions, the more lore.
A key thing is that Blizzard has repeatedly stated "it will not play like World of WarCraft, it'll be unique in comparison to that," though that's not to say it'll be unique in itself. Although, I personally would love it if it was guild/clan/brood based. Your own character, obviously, in my eyes, but banded together with others around. Making you not some "invincible" being but a regular "Joe" for starters. Both StarCraft 1 and 2 both show there isn't much already conquered over, so it doesn't leave much room for random humonoid races, although it has been said that the Protoss would "watch over" lesser humanoid beings.AA7Dragoon wrote: Notice how Jeff didn't say "MMORPG?" He just said MMO. Could we be looking at a StarCraft MMORTS? Where players own their own armies, ban together as guilds to rule planets, and war across the galaxy? Methinks the omission was intentional.