Campaign Creations

Posted: **Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:13 am**

RazorclawX wrote:
Magic wrote:
tipereth wrote: It was fucking terrible. The charm of Bond is that he just don't give a fuck. He isn't motivated by revenge, or love, or anything like that. He just does his job. This wasn't James Bond, it was just some douche in a suit running around killing people. Now, I'd totally go see Douche In A Suit, but I didn't go to see that. I went to see Bond, and I got shit.
I'm saying this as a matter of fact: you're the first person I've met who hates it.
I can't believe that. Everyone I know was let down by this movie.

This^, my dad who's a pretty big bond fan basically said that the action scenes were vomit inducing and that cutting camera angles every 2 seconds is really fucking stupid in a 10 minute action scene.

Posted: **Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:24 pm**

RazorclawX wrote:
Magic wrote:
tipereth wrote: It was fucking terrible. The charm of Bond is that he just don't give a fuck. He isn't motivated by revenge, or love, or anything like that. He just does his job. This wasn't James Bond, it was just some douche in a suit running around killing people. Now, I'd totally go see Douche In A Suit, but I didn't go to see that. I went to see Bond, and I got shit.
I'm saying this as a matter of fact: you're the first person I've met who hates it.
I can't believe that. Everyone I know was let down by this movie.

And funny enough, everyone I know actually loved the movie. Go figure.

Posted: **Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:35 pm**

Only a select few didnt like it because they said that the new actor Daniel Craig sucked.
Everyone else liked it.

Posted: **Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:02 pm**

Marine wrote: Only a select few didnt like it because they said that the new actor Daniel Craig sucked.

Yes, most of the people who didn't like it disliked it for a variety of other reasons.

Posted: **Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:46 pm**

Marine wrote: Only a select few didnt like it because they said that the new actor Daniel Craig sucked.
Everyone else liked it.

Refer to my post at the top of the page and Freakaholik's post on the last page.

I also must reinstate the simple fact that still remains: Sean Connery 4 lyfe

Posted: **Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:37 pm**

Pierce Brlolsnan or Sean Lolery were great bonds. Craig has a retarded face.

Also the movie sucked dick, action was all cuts and shaky cam, bond has no emotions, and the dude playing him has a stupid face.

Posted: **Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:29 am**

Zilla- wrote: Pierce Brlolsnan or Sean Lolery were great bonds. Craig has a retarded face.

It's rugged and, besides his hair, was one of the first WAAAH from the Bond purists when Craig took on the role.

Also the movie sucked dick, action was all cuts and shaky cam, bond has no emotions, and the dude playing him has a stupid face.

I somehow doubt Zilla will be writing reviews for The Guardian anytime soon.

Posted: **Tue Dec 02, 2008 12:59 pm**

Magic wrote:
Zilla- wrote: Pierce Brlolsnan or Sean Lolery were great bonds. Craig has a retarded face.
It's rugged and, besides his hair, was one of the first WAAAH from the Bond purists when Craig took on the role.

Also the movie sucked dick, action was all cuts and shaky cam, bond has no emotions, and the dude playing him has a stupid face.
I somehow doubt Zilla will be writing reviews for The Guardian anytime soon.

Plz explain how shitty camera work in any way makes a good movie.

Posted: **Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:35 pm**

I couldn't really tell what was happening at all in the movie... the beginning especially. FLASH OF CAR. FLASH OF TRUCK. SOMETHING CRASHES. Probably a car chasing them? TUNNELS. THEY COME OUT. FLASH OF CAR FRONT. etc.

Posted: **Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:11 pm**

He's a SPY. You don't see the whole picture because it's CLASSIFIED. DUH.

Posted: **Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:48 pm**

ya lol
whats wrong with you people

Posted: **Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:06 pm**

Was anyone else profoundly disturbed by the beaver shot?

Posted: **Thu Dec 04, 2008 2:53 pm**

wibod wrote:
CDLVII wrote: I did not see any UMP's throughout the whole movie, FALSE ADVERTISEMENTS.
I'd be more inclined to say it's an MP5 in the promotional shot you're talking about because of the height of the length of the suppressor and this: http://images.google.ca/images?gbv=2&hl ... rch+Images

http://ambienceofmedia.com/wp-content/u ... solace.jpg <assuming this is the shot you're talking about and the apparent lack of a charging handle made me think it was a UMP at first

I think it really is a UMP though, looking at the second advertisement picture shows a skeletal butt on the weapon which is more common on UMP's than MP5's. Also a second clue is the blocky build that clues it to the imitation license body of the MP5 (It's just an MP5 for the .45 ACP)

Also it looks like the UMP from counter strike, lol.

Posted: **Thu Dec 04, 2008 4:38 pm**

CDLVII wrote:
wibod wrote:
CDLVII wrote: I did not see any UMP's throughout the whole movie, FALSE ADVERTISEMENTS.
I'd be more inclined to say it's an MP5 in the promotional shot you're talking about because of the height of the length of the suppressor and this: http://images.google.ca/images?gbv=2&hl ... rch+Images

http://ambienceofmedia.com/wp-content/u ... solace.jpg <assuming this is the shot you're talking about and the apparent lack of a charging handle made me think it was a UMP at first

I think it really is a UMP though, looking at the second advertisement picture shows a skeletal butt on the weapon which is more common on UMP's than MP5's. Also a second clue is the blocky build that clues it to the imitation license body of the MP5 (It's just an MP5 for the .45 ACP)

Also it looks like the UMP from counter strike, lol.

MP5s are sold with with folding stocks like that and the UMP doesn't usually have a curved magazine.

Posted: **Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:12 pm**

wibod wrote:
CDLVII wrote:
wibod wrote:
CDLVII wrote: I did not see any UMP's throughout the whole movie, FALSE ADVERTISEMENTS.
I'd be more inclined to say it's an MP5 in the promotional shot you're talking about because of the height of the length of the suppressor and this: http://images.google.ca/images?gbv=2&hl ... rch+Images

http://ambienceofmedia.com/wp-content/u ... solace.jpg <assuming this is the shot you're talking about and the apparent lack of a charging handle made me think it was a UMP at first

I think it really is a UMP though, looking at the second advertisement picture shows a skeletal butt on the weapon which is more common on UMP's than MP5's. Also a second clue is the blocky build that clues it to the imitation license body of the MP5 (It's just an MP5 for the .45 ACP)

Also it looks like the UMP from counter strike, lol.
MP5s are sold with with folding stocks like that and the UMP doesn't usually have a curved magazine.

Pics plz.

That curved mag is a 9mm from the MP5, but looking at it kinda shows that it doesn't really fit the slot the weapon was built with. I'unno why they'd convert it to a 9 mil though, but it doesn't fit as snuggly as say... a magazine of .45 ACP rounds would. *cough*

lol

Campaign Creations

James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.

Re: James Bond 007: Quantum of Solace.