Page 9 of 25
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:22 pm
by Hercanic
IskatuMesk wrote:Boy do I love it when people have the gall to bitch about my commentary/voice. My voice is the fucking serenade of the Gods. I just delete their comments in that instance.
Your commentary and voice pwns, IskatuMesk. It's like a fine wine, a taste those unrefined heathens don't even
deserve to acquire, but you are a generous one.
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:26 pm
by Fighter84
Yeah, your commentary kicks ass, Isk. Honestly, if you were in stand-up comedy, I would pay like 1,000 bucks to see you make jokes lol!
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:49 pm
by IskatuMesk
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:23 am
by Fighter84
Hey Isk, I have a question for you. If I was to somehow get a hold of StarCraft 2, could these specs run it(what you are about to see may shock you)
Operating system:Windows 2.5.1.2600 (SP 3)
CPU type: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz
CPU Speed (GHz):1.749
System memory (GB):0.492
Graphics card model:Mobile Intel(R) 915GM/GMS,910GML Express Chipset Family
Graphics card driver:igxprd32.dll
Desktop resolution:1024x768
Hard disk size (GB):74.528
Hard disk free space (GB):47.812
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:31 am
by IskatuMesk
Um.... No. That is a pretty horrible onboard video, but I think it's the ram that would eat you alive above all else. I mean, Laconius is scraping by with a system that's also pretty awful on the lowest of settings... but I think that's pushing it.
Also, I just discovered that Void Rays are useless against Carriers. I mean useless.
/e Played Platinum 1v1 some more.
Got completely destroyed in a PvP again. I don't know. I didn't float that many resources. I did fuck one of my geysers by accident. The game just went steadily downhill from there.
Played a PvZ. That went better. Won despite uploading and having 2-3sec delays from massive lag.
Played some more FFA's. Most of them ended terribly. My verdict is that Void Rays are completely useless against carriers. Believe me, I didn't touch a fleet of carriers with 20-30 void rays.
Also, phoenixes really do suck vs mutas.
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:57 am
by IskatuMesk
You have a system worse than that? How the hell have you guys reached 2010 on these things?
Fighter's laptop is comparable to my notebook. It's not going to run sc2, at least not in any good form. Intel onboard video is kind of bad. It doesn't support hardware T&L which is a complete killer.
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 2:17 am
by Lavarinth
How do you guys survive with onboard video?
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:49 am
by UntamedLoli
I used to play Halo PC with an onboard, there was no textures or anything and everything was shades of grey.
It produced very amazing results in MP.
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:22 pm
by Mucky
I played Natural Selection with onboard video. Invisible Skulks had this dark shade of green and it was like they weren't invisible at all. I got a lot of hacker accusations over that.
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:00 pm
by Fighter84
Honestly, I have SO many games that I can't play on Steam, so I just play StarCraft and Warcraft III. BTW your answer would be a flat out no? Don't waste my time trying to make it run at an acceptable speed?
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:06 pm
by IskatuMesk
Get a new computer. Preferably one that isn't older than 99% of CC's forumbase.
/e
man fuck people who fly all their buildings all over the place to try to hide them. I mean, sure in an FFA you can land on an island and make a comeback, but when you're losing horribly in a 2v2 or 1v1 and you just prolong the match you are a faggot and I will make your death miserable and painful. This isn't even CC's, just raxes and factories flying around and landing on islands. Cocksuckers.
I can see them and all but it's just to piss me off.
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:20 pm
by Frozty
You could buy another craptop for around 500 bucks that would easily satisfy the requirements for SC2. Now, you must also be ready to wipe it of all its brandware garbage that HP, Dell, etc. always include on their laptops.
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 12:54 am
by IskatuMesk
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
also installing win7 2maro
expect delayed uploads ect
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:06 pm
by BahamutZERO
ZE MOUSTACHE LORDZ WANTZ MOAR VIDEOZ.
Re: IskatuMesk SC2 Beta Coverage
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:02 pm
by Hercanic
For all these parts, if you make the next part as a Video Response, in effect stringing them together in linear order, it'd be easier to watch these sequentially without combing through the big list o' vids (which often cuts off the most relevant piece of the title, so you have to hover your mouse to see the full title in the tooltip) or coming back to the thread.