So I'm a Dark Templar because I was being cautious and didn't have a chance to post earlier that day? I'm sorry, I've almost lynched Lav for the wrong reason before, I didn't want to repeat that near mistake again. I'm sure that lynching an innocent Protoss is a mistake you don't want to commit either.
AA7Dragoon wrote:
^ No, Praetor. As I previously mentioned, Lavarinth revealed another suspect Dark Templar. I will now finish the quote to when he changed his strategy from wanting to execute someone the first day, to switching to abstain:
Thalraxal, in a sense, does have a valid point if you understand where Mucky's going on with this. I'll abstain without issue at all. I'm afraid of accusing the wrong person- Simple enough.
It was in agreement with Thalraxal that Lavarinth suddenly wanted to abstain for the day.
He also agreed with Mucky. Does that make Mucky a Dark Templar too, AA7? I guess we're dealing with Crazy Suicidal Dark Templar then. Guess that'll make our job easier, eh?
I began to probe Thalraxal's remarks, and observed these statements:
Yeah, I'd like to hear from AA7 on all this too. I'm not sure I trust Lav at all right now, but I don't want to risk lynching an innocent Protoss. Especially an Observer. Looking at the people he identified:
Although Thal would later question if Lavarinth was the Observer, his immediate remarks are in defensive agreement for Lavarinth's case to sew doubt in our minds.
Again, caution. Lav's accusation of Aek was suspicious, and you weren't (and still aren't) a proven innocent. For all I knew, Lav's remarks were nothing but a slip up and you were a Dark Templar seeking to take advantage of them. In fact, if it wasn't evident that Lav was a Dark Templar and that you led his lynching, I'd still be suspicious of you, AA7.
And of course, I was merely echoing Aek's own sentiments. Does his caution make him a Dark Templar too? No. They tried to kill him, we know he's innocent!
Of course, the pressure was too great on Lavarinth, with the final tally counting as: "2 votes for Lavarinth, 2 votes for Shadowflare, 1 vote for Ricky, 1 vote for mAc, and 1 abstain."
Remember when I said this about Lavarinth:
If indeed you were reckless enough to expose yourself to be an Observer, Lavarinth, where are your Dark Templar brothers to take advantage of the situation? They should be elated by the prospect to immediately side with my call for your execution. Why am I nearly the only one so far?
So who were the last to vote for Lavarinth's execution? Thalraxal and Shadowflare. Who voted back-to-back to abstain the first night? Thalraxal and Shadowflare. You see, brothers, it is quite clear the two sacrificed Lavarinth in order to reduce suspicion upon themselves. Shadowflare was already tied with 2 votes against her. They had to vote against Lavarinth because if the two voted for either Ricky or mAc, their identities would have been revealed by the obvious tilting of votes to save Lavarinth and Shadowflare!
You realize you fit your own criteria? You also voted to abstain on the first Day and lynch Lav on the second. Does that make you a Dark Templar? No.
Of course, maybe you are one of Lav's Dark Templar brothers seeking to take advantage of the situation. The Dark Templar have never attacked you, so you're not a proven innocent. You knew that Lav was finished after his slip-up with Aek, and decided to sacrfice him in order to "prove" your own innocence. But of course, that's not possible, since we all know that you are the most innocent of us all.
Oh, wait. It was Dark Templar Lavarinth that said that. Oops.
Lavarinth wrote:
AA7, after my investigation, I know you are in fact innocent, and hopefully if any death were to come to you it'd be by the hands of the Dark Templar, and not your brethren accusing you because you are the most innocent of them all.