Star Alliance bites the dust
Moderator: Milldawg
- IskatuMesk
- Xel'naga World Shaper
- Posts: 8332
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞా
Re: Star Alliance bites the dust
EGGPLANTS
- ShadowFlare
- Terran Science Facility Guinea Pig
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: Star Alliance bites the dust
Unfortunately, there may not be much you can do about that if it has to do with images that are out of your control, like when someone includes an image by URL that's not HTTPS. These days they expect everything to be served over HTTPS for it to give the secure indicator in the address bar. Possibly even if it's content from another server?Lavarinth wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 6:52 pm Like many others, employers are instituting a work-from-home policy for the time being.
EDIT: HTTPS has been enabled, however when viewing a specific list of forum threads (a particular subforum as opposed to the overall forum) and when inside a thread it is displaying a Not Secure statement. Investigating this while also working on the theme.
On that note, when I was talking about my site before, I did fix my avatar URL to a new HTTPS URL. I had to figure out how to get it accepted, but I got it.

(It just didn't like the file extension)
btw, Mesk's long purple organic supplement is one cause of the not secure statement, or at least for now.
- Lavarinth
- Xel'naga Administrator
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:21 pm
- Location: His Ashworld Planet
Re: Star Alliance bites the dust
I'll just move his site to https also. 

- - Lavarinth
Campaign Creations Administrator
Campaign Creations Administrator
- ShadowFlare
- Terran Science Facility Guinea Pig
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: Star Alliance bites the dust
Also, if you want to see what the offending content is, at least in Chrome when you open the developer tools and go to the console tab, it shows warnings in the log. Might do the same on other browsers.
I don't think it cares about just links though, btw, as long as it's not trying to actually display content.
I don't think it cares about just links though, btw, as long as it's not trying to actually display content.
- Lavarinth
- Xel'naga Administrator
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:21 pm
- Location: His Ashworld Planet
Re: Star Alliance bites the dust
So I've just discovered as you replied! I'll see what I can do about this since if this is the case, obviously this shouldn't be happening on a list of threads also. I'll get this sorted while also trying to figure out why I can't update the style. Love this new phpBB, let me say!! 
EDIT: Oh, it's the overlay portraits.

EDIT: Oh, it's the overlay portraits.
- - Lavarinth
Campaign Creations Administrator
Campaign Creations Administrator
- ShadowFlare
- Terran Science Facility Guinea Pig
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: Star Alliance bites the dust
Yeah, I just figured that one out, too. I guess just don't worry about it. 
- IskatuMesk
- Xel'naga World Shaper
- Posts: 8332
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞా
Re: Star Alliance bites the dust
omg I am dying laughingShadowFlare wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 9:45 am long purple organic supplement is one cause of the not secure statement
- ShadowFlare
- Terran Science Facility Guinea Pig
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: Star Alliance bites the dust
Yes, I noticed the file name. ![Smile :]](./images/smilies/flat-smile.gif)
![Smile :]](./images/smilies/flat-smile.gif)
- IskatuMesk
- Xel'naga World Shaper
- Posts: 8332
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞా