Void Ray Massing

Void Ray Massing: Kills the game???

Damn yeah! V-Ray's for noobs and CRYBABIES!
2
17%
Break this option only in case of later game.
3
25%
Perhaps, never saw it, if I did, I don't know what to make...
0
No votes
Insulting! I use it a lotta times!
2
17%
AWAY FROM MY PRECIOUS!!!
5
42%
 
Total votes: 12

User avatar
Falchion
Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
Posts: 593
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:32 pm
Location: Bragança Paulista, Brazil (Da most borin' place in the world)
Contact:

Void Ray Massing

Post by Falchion »

Who else here thinks Void Ray massing mania screwed up the game more than Colossi, Marauders and Roaches, please, raise their hands...
User avatar
IskatuMesk
Xel'naga World Shaper
Xel'naga World Shaper
Posts: 8328
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞ‌ా

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by IskatuMesk »

Eh... Void Rays aren't as bad as Marauders. You can still kill them pretty easily. Plus they are really, really expensive. May as well be massing Carriers at that rate.
User avatar
Krazy
Zerg Creep Colony Landscaper
Zerg Creep Colony Landscaper
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:49 am

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by Krazy »

My... my preeeeeciouuusss... you can not has my preciiiiooouuussss...
tipereth
Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
Posts: 597
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:37 pm

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by tipereth »

The issue is that yeah, it's pretty impossible to stop someone who's massing void rays. So you don't let them mass void rays. Problem solved!
User avatar
IskatuMesk
Xel'naga World Shaper
Xel'naga World Shaper
Posts: 8328
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞ‌ా

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by IskatuMesk »

Impossible? No. Difficult, yes, but not impossible. There are worse things than Void Rays.
User avatar
AA7Dragoon
Protoss Khalai Missionary
Protoss Khalai Missionary
Posts: 1039
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 10:09 am
Location: Washington, USA

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by AA7Dragoon »

It's annoying but takes a long time to pull off, and you have to have A TON of Void Rays to become close to invincible. Essentially, you need to empty out an entire expansion of resources just to build a fleet you need, and not many games last that long.

A good counter to scout out such an opponent. If you know early on they are massing void rays, then you attack them early because they have to devote all their resources to minimal cannnon defenses, stocking probes for expansions, and massing void rays.
User avatar
RazorclawX
Xel'naga World Shaper
Xel'naga World Shaper
Posts: 2078
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:19 pm

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by RazorclawX »

I hate Marauders more as Protoss since they seem to counter both Zealots and Stalkers.
tipereth
Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
Posts: 597
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:37 pm

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by tipereth »

Just one sentry makes zealots eat marauders.
User avatar
Whiplash!
Xel'naga World Shaper
Xel'naga World Shaper
Posts: 963
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:21 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by Whiplash! »

I always mass void rays in 3v3/4v4
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
User avatar
Ricky_Honejasi
Xel'naga Solar Moderator
Xel'naga Solar Moderator
Posts: 2011
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:50 pm

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by Ricky_Honejasi »

RazorclawX wrote:I hate Marauders more as Protoss since they seem to counter both Zealots and Stalkers.
Honestly, I always wondered why Marauders have Stim on top of Punisher Grenades since the combo of both (along with hit-run-hit micro) seems to make the Marauders takes the Marine's place when only ground is concerned.

Or maybe the Zealots really need Charge when it comes to Marauders as well.
User avatar
UntamedLoli
Protoss Zealot Practice Dummy
Protoss Zealot Practice Dummy
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Canada, BC
Contact:

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by UntamedLoli »

Massing Void Rays is pretty much the same thing as massing Carriers, if you see it happening you put a stop to it before it gets that threatening because they probably won't have much else to defend with.

I've run into several people trying to mass Carriers before and all it takes is scouting and dropping their Fleet Bacon to stop/delay it.
User avatar
IskatuMesk
Xel'naga World Shaper
Xel'naga World Shaper
Posts: 8328
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞ‌ా

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by IskatuMesk »

I just let them mass Carriers. Because when they invest all that money, come out, and lose it all, they usually just leave because there's few ways they can recover.

But it's pretty easy to stop them earlier if you want to. Pylons are a good target, if you want something a little more permanent.
User avatar
Quirriff
Terran Barracks Laundry Master
Terran Barracks Laundry Master
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:00 pm

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by Quirriff »

Void rays are easy to beat, a VR rush is easily beaten, and VR massing is predictable, because they don't attack for a while, it usually means they are building a largish force of air units.
User avatar
Falchion
Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
Posts: 593
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:32 pm
Location: Bragança Paulista, Brazil (Da most borin' place in the world)
Contact:

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by Falchion »

Ricky_Honejasi wrote:
RazorclawX wrote:Or maybe the Zealots really need Charge when it comes to Marauders as well.
Agreed. Zealot Charge and Speedling meat shield really do wonders.
User avatar
IskatuMesk
Xel'naga World Shaper
Xel'naga World Shaper
Posts: 8328
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞ‌ా

Re: Void Ray Massing

Post by IskatuMesk »

That FFA really brought to light some of the things I wanted to try out in PvT. Ultimately my conclusions are as follows;

- That nerf they did to Stalkers (they don't get upgrade bonus for their bonus to armored) made a terrible unit even worse late-game. Stalkers really are terrible. You need a shitton of them to do any damage and they die in an instant if something looks at them funny.
- 3 Defense Drones will shut down like 20 stalkers. You must have void rays in this instance.
- A lot of people would always say, "lol void rays own vikings" (even when outmatched numerically.) I've always witnessed the exact opposite. Okay, upgraded Void Rays can chase them if they run, but that's about it. Once you have a certain number of vikings in they air they just destroy everything because of that 9 range.
- Thors are terrible vs everything the Protoss have in the air. On the flip side, so are Carriers when it comes to maxed end-game armies. Yeah, Carriers get a nice big spike from interceptors popping out, but both Thors and BC's mitigate this a lot. Oh yeah, and DD's shoot down those too. But the biggest weakness Carriers have in sc2 is the fact that, unlike BW, their interceptors don't return to regen their shields. This means that when the fight starts there's a good chance half of your interceptors are going to die very, very fast. You could argue and say, "Well that's fine, at least that's dps not on your units", but losing even a few interceptors totally cripples the Carrier's damage output.

Also, I'm pretty sure the Interceptor deployment range is either smaller than vikings or about the same. That was really the carrier's strength in bw was its range. Since Carriers didn't get the one-way ticket on the Faster, More Intense Dustin Browder express to buffsville the only advantage they got in sc2 was their dual shot and better AI. This is great - vs small units like marines and hydras, as long as there isn't enough to gun down the interceptors in an instant (see my FFA where I totally obliterate a fleet of interceptors in half a second with EMP and marines)...

Battlecruisers were always stronger than Carriers but now it's worse. Yamato charges faster and their DPS is much more consistent.

Basically, I've always thought that Carriers were decent. And they are. But not vs other t3.5 units. They really need something. I'd say they need health or armor. Probably armor.

- Void Rays. You'll become to depend on them. As the subject of this thread, I felt I should explain my experiences with Void Rays.

I almost always massed Carriers in an FFA, but because this was a big map and I was trying to hold territory against two mobile Terran aggressors, I came to depend almost exclusively on Void Rays as my defense option.

They suck. But they're the only redeeming thing you've got.

- If you can faze their lasers you'll do decent damage. If you can build a charge up, they'll do decent damage. If you get caught without charge you're probably dead unless something else is taking damage for your. Void Rays die in 1 yamato and in seconds to focused BC or Viking fire. They need those seconds to charge up their death ray. Until their charge is maxed they are basically useless.
- Phoenixes, totally useless. Yeah, they can fire while moving. Big whoop. You'll kill, what, a Mutalisk? Mutalisks suck too, but they attack land so you'll probably be making them anyways. Building a Phoenix vs Terran is a waste of money, especially in an end game situation.
- Motherships are almost completely useless except to use for cloaking. Vortex sucks in all your interceptors - anything that didn't get sucked in by it will now proceed to obliterate your Carriers uncontested. The damage is poor, the mobility is unheard of. I don't know why this unit is even in the game still. It baffles me, like Marauders and Roaches.

Both Terran and Zerg have great options for breaking walls. Yamato, Tanks, Nukes, Mustaches, secret worms. Protoss have proxy pylons and Prisms - which die the second something sees them (sensors) and require either a worker or an air unit which a Viking will kill in an instant.

So I decided to try Colossi. It was then I realized how fucked you are on the ground. Immortals would probably be a better choice if not for the fact they can't hit air, so bcs will eat them alive, and they still cost 4 supply. So you have to try to goade them with Colossi and hope there's no tanks. You can't snipe the tanks with Void Rays because turrets kill void rays just as easily as anything else. You can snipe them with carriers, but again you'll probably lose them in the process and gain nothing.

As retarded as Colossi are, there's a reason why I never fear them.

I tried Storm. Okay, so Templar are slow as balls and half the time the Terrans were in the perfect spot to land storms on them they weren't even halfway to the fight and all my stalkers died. The other times their storms went off they did no damage. Seriously, storm sucks. They nerfed the fuck out of the damage and the radius is pathetic. It takes like 4 storms to kill a single thor.

Protoss aren't as screwed as Zerg are, but there's definitely some things that need some reworking.

- Stalkers need some damage. They suck. They've always sucked. You can do cute, predictable blink bullshit with them but nothing changes the fact that they vastly lose effectiveness when upgrades come into play.
- Same thing with Carriers. They need something. A buildspeed reduction isn't going to change a damn thing. If Carriers got buffed then Void Rays would be back where they belong - as tier 2 support units, and not something you have to exclusively depend on to respond to any kind of air force confidently.
- Storm needs a buff. It's needed a buff since beta and it still sucks. Yeah, you can kill some marines and hydras with it. But it doesn't do shit all to all of the units that had their health quadrupled in sc2.
- Defense drones need an internal cooldown.
Post Reply