Patch 3
-
- Zerg Infested Terran (Unemployed)
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 2:41 am
Re: Patch 3
As opposed to Queen and Drone. Blizzard never had creativity, they had polish.
- Thalraxal
- Protoss Stargate Concierge
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Patch 3
Queen and Drone are logical names, however, they're related to their functions in the Swarm. But roach? Meaningless! Generic bug-alien name!Xelxiuz wrote: As opposed to Queen and Drone. Blizzard never had creativity, they had polish.
-
- Zerg Infested Terran (Unemployed)
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 2:41 am
Re: Patch 3
Roach = Cockroach = Bugs that survive nukes. Only two steps more to make the link.
- Taeradun
- Protoss Khalai Missionary
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:08 pm
- Location: AU
- Contact:
Re: Patch 3
and they burn your fingers if you don't use a clip
- Thalraxal
- Protoss Stargate Concierge
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Patch 3
I know what they're referencing with the name, Xel. 'Roach' is still a terrible name for a unit. I'm sure they could have a spent a whole fifteen minutes and come up with a better name than that.Xelxiuz wrote: Roach = Cockroach = Bugs that survive nukes. Only two steps more to make the link.
- Lavarinth
- Xel'naga Administrator
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:21 pm
- Location: His Ashworld Planet
Re: Patch 3
Roach is indeed a terrible name. Might as well call it Regenling.
- - Lavarinth
Campaign Creations Administrator
Campaign Creations Administrator
- Taeradun
- Protoss Khalai Missionary
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:08 pm
- Location: AU
- Contact:
Re: Patch 3
Cocklisk
-
- Zerg Infested Terran (Unemployed)
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 2:41 am
Re: Patch 3
That's your 15 minutes worth of answer =[
- IskatuMesk
- Xel'naga World Shaper
- Posts: 8328
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞా
Re: Patch 3
Has new bonus damage type "Penetrating"Taeralisk wrote: Cocklisk
- Thalraxal
- Protoss Stargate Concierge
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Patch 3
Taeralisk wrote: Cocklisk
And it's still better than 'Roach'.Xelxiuz wrote: That's your 15 minutes worth of answer =[
I think I'll go with Lav's Regenling for now. From this day forward, I shall only refer to the Roach as the Regenling, and no one will have any clue what I'm talking about!
- Taeradun
- Protoss Khalai Missionary
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:08 pm
- Location: AU
- Contact:
Re: Patch 3
Dung beetle
- Taeradun
- Protoss Khalai Missionary
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:08 pm
- Location: AU
- Contact:
Re: Patch 3
wait wait, I got it
how about "Roachlisk"
how about "Roachlisk"
- Hercanic
- Protoss Stargate Concierge
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:11 am
- Contact:
Re: Patch 3
Hydr-a-lisk
Mut-a-lisk
Ultr-a-lisk
So if anything, it'd have to be a Roachalisk.
Honestly, though, I'm fine with the name Roach. The monosyllabic word is short, simple, and connotates everything the unit is. A real roach is sneaky, able to slip between cracks and pop up in your home when you least suspect it. The skittering bug is vile, but a hearty survivor.
When you are naming something, you want to evoke an emotion and (particularly in an RTS) communicate as much as possible about the unit in a simple way. Very few unit names in Starcraft are completely made-up. They usually have a basis in something, which communicates its role, function, or flavor. The Carrier, Observer, Larva, Overlord, Queen, Siege Tank, Battlecruiser, etc, are all plain English words. A name like Firebat, which is Starcraft's own term, still has a very overt meaning with the prefix fire-.
In short, I don't see the name Roach as differing from Starcraft's established conventions.
Mut-a-lisk
Ultr-a-lisk
So if anything, it'd have to be a Roachalisk.
Honestly, though, I'm fine with the name Roach. The monosyllabic word is short, simple, and connotates everything the unit is. A real roach is sneaky, able to slip between cracks and pop up in your home when you least suspect it. The skittering bug is vile, but a hearty survivor.
When you are naming something, you want to evoke an emotion and (particularly in an RTS) communicate as much as possible about the unit in a simple way. Very few unit names in Starcraft are completely made-up. They usually have a basis in something, which communicates its role, function, or flavor. The Carrier, Observer, Larva, Overlord, Queen, Siege Tank, Battlecruiser, etc, are all plain English words. A name like Firebat, which is Starcraft's own term, still has a very overt meaning with the prefix fire-.
In short, I don't see the name Roach as differing from Starcraft's established conventions.
- Xenon
- Zerg Queen's Nest Slave Trainee
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Patch 3
I still like Cheese-Child's list of Zerg units.
Drone
Worker
Soldier
Queen
King
Ace
Dog
Angry Dog
Mutant Dog
Angry Mutant Dog
Dogdralisk
Elephant
Elephantlisk
DefiledSlimeBeastLord
Attackdralisk
Beastolisk
Liskdralisk
Liskmastah Z
Giant Blimpolisk
Satan
"This is a picture of one of the ham monster units, the meatloafdralisk. Like all other units of that race they are big and fat and ugly and made entirely out of meat."
Drone
Worker
Soldier
Queen
King
Ace
Dog
Angry Dog
Mutant Dog
Angry Mutant Dog
Dogdralisk
Elephant
Elephantlisk
DefiledSlimeBeastLord
Attackdralisk
Beastolisk
Liskdralisk
Liskmastah Z
Giant Blimpolisk
Satan
"This is a picture of one of the ham monster units, the meatloafdralisk. Like all other units of that race they are big and fat and ugly and made entirely out of meat."
- Death_Wing
- Terran Starport Baggage Handler
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:32 am
- Location: I don't like it but: "South Africa" X_X