Re: Contest's Campaigns
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:14 pm
Hmmmmm..... An interesting point. To be honest, I'm not sure where I stand on this, although siding with Dem0nS1ayer would be in our best interest. What makes me unsure is the fact that the contest, after a point, was no longer required to cover the full four years. If we all had to cover the same amount of time, it would make sense for more missions to be better considering that SC vanilla and SC: BW were about 50 missions and that was only a little over 2 years in the timeline. However, now that it is a matter of choice, I don't think the mission count means much because we chose to go farther. That was why I was pissy about story seeming to not be taken as seriously as it should (and I don't want to start that battle up again!). If I had it my way, the story judging would serve as a bit of a counter-balance to the "early release" aspect of professionalism. But I don't make the rules and I respect that. If we lose, it's because of me and Tim, not the judges.Dem0nS1ayer wrote:No, I'm just saying that if you have twice the amount of missions that someone else has, it'll probably take longer to finish them. If all of the campaigns were the same length, then it would be a good idea to give early entries some bonus points. Seeing as how some are short (not a bad thing), and how some a longer, you can't really judge it on how long it takes to make it.
In short, meh.......