Diablo 3 beta
Moderator: Milldawg
- IskatuMesk
- Xel'naga World Shaper
- Posts: 8328
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞా
Re: Diablo 3 beta
I don't think it's possible to miss currently. I'm not seeing it happen often at least.
- UntamedLoli
- Protoss Zealot Practice Dummy
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:36 pm
- Location: Canada, BC
- Contact:
- Lavarinth
- Xel'naga Administrator
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:21 pm
- Location: His Ashworld Planet
Re: Diablo 3 beta
It's realistic.DrumsofWar wrote:How are attack and miss chances handled in D3? Is it closer to D & D rules or an adaption of WoW mechanics?
IE: If you swing at something in front of you, you will HIT the damn thing.
I hate miss mechanics.
- - Lavarinth
Campaign Creations Administrator
Campaign Creations Administrator
- Hercanic
- Protoss Stargate Concierge
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:11 am
- Contact:
Re: Diablo 3 beta
Now, if they had the animation budget to script cool Matrix-style dodging manuevers when you miss a monster, then that'd be pretty cool. Without visual feedback, however, miss mechanics simply disrupt immersion.
- Pr0nogo
- Protoss Zealot Practice Dummy
- Posts: 874
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 3:59 pm
- Contact:
Re: Diablo 3 beta
You DO know which developer we're talking about, right?budget
- IskatuMesk
- Xel'naga World Shaper
- Posts: 8328
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞా
Re: Diablo 3 beta
You guys are missing the whole point of the game.
Physics.
God, haven't you ever played Titan Quest?
Physics.
God, haven't you ever played Titan Quest?
- Falchion
- Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:32 pm
- Location: Bragança Paulista, Brazil (Da most borin' place in the world)
- Contact:
Re: Diablo 3 beta
IskatuMesk wrote:You guys are missing the whole point of the game.
Physics.
God, haven't you ever played Titan Quest?
Mesk. Physics alone won't save Diablo 3.
And no, I didn't play it.
- Hercanic
- Protoss Stargate Concierge
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:11 am
- Contact:
Re: Diablo 3 beta
A developer that has been owned by a media conglomerate since 1994. While independently managed, they still have a bottom line, and every feature has a cost and priority.Pr0nogo wrote:You DO know which developer we're talking about, right?budget
What I was saying isn't so much about whether Blizzard could afford to do it, rather what it would take to make a small mechanic like missing work well. It'd be cool, but expensive, and for a company looking at returns, it's a lot more economical to simply cut the mechanic when its impact on gameplay is relatively minor.
- Lavarinth
- Xel'naga Administrator
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:21 pm
- Location: His Ashworld Planet
Re: Diablo 3 beta
Are you sure? It's pretty awesome to see things fly.Falchion wrote:Physics alone won't save Diablo 3.
"Oh yeah?! Eat my arrow!" *Shoots* *Corpse rolls backwards 15 feet*
- - Lavarinth
Campaign Creations Administrator
Campaign Creations Administrator
- IskatuMesk
- Xel'naga World Shaper
- Posts: 8328
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞా
Re: Diablo 3 beta
lol, 15 feet? That's not even close to what I get in distances. Not even close.
- Falchion
- Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:32 pm
- Location: Bragança Paulista, Brazil (Da most borin' place in the world)
- Contact:
Re: Diablo 3 beta
Definitely sure. All kinds of games promise something new, yet they focus on it and not on the other IMPORTANT things which is graphics quality, sound, gameplay and such. A great example of it is STORMRISE (Which's a console port as well), in which it's "Whip Select" feature alone didn't save the game, with it's horrible texture work, clunky AI, glitched controls, lousy ending, poor camera management, and the list goes on. The only thing good out of it was voice acting and music, but still it wasn't enough.Lavarinth wrote:Are you sure? It's pretty awesome to see things fly.Falchion wrote:Physics alone won't save Diablo 3.
Need more, Lav?
- IskatuMesk
- Xel'naga World Shaper
- Posts: 8328
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞా
Re: Diablo 3 beta
Actually, I think D3 is something I may end up doing an LP of. I mean, it has its weird shit and I don't agree with the decisions made in the graphics, but on its own it isn't as bad as Titan Quest or the million other clones. It doesn't disappoint me as much as sc2 did.
- Lavarinth
- Xel'naga Administrator
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:21 pm
- Location: His Ashworld Planet
Re: Diablo 3 beta
Let's see... No AA yet, No Ultra settings yet, some still clear beta issues with sound including missing options, and bugs galore.. Oh, that's right, we're all playing and watching a beta, not a release.Falchion wrote:Definitely sure. All kinds of games promise something new, yet they focus on it and not on the other IMPORTANT things which is graphics quality, sound, gameplay and such. A great example of it is STORMRISE (Which's a console port as well), in which it's "Whip Select" feature alone didn't save the game, with it's horrible texture work, clunky AI, glitched controls, lousy ending, poor camera management, and the list goes on. The only thing good out of it was voice acting and music, but still it wasn't enough.Lavarinth wrote:Are you sure? It's pretty awesome to see things fly.Falchion wrote:Physics alone won't save Diablo 3.
Need more, Lav?
You can't judge any of those aspects until the game's released.
- - Lavarinth
Campaign Creations Administrator
Campaign Creations Administrator
- IskatuMesk
- Xel'naga World Shaper
- Posts: 8328
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: M͈̙̞͍͞ͅE̹H̨͇̰͈͕͇̫Ì̩̳CO̼̩̤͖͘ జ్ఞా
Re: Diablo 3 beta
I added an extended review to the OP.
- Falchion
- Zerg Hydralisk Nail Stylist
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:32 pm
- Location: Bragança Paulista, Brazil (Da most borin' place in the world)
- Contact:
Re: Diablo 3 beta
Remember B.Net 2.0 for WoL? In Beta. Mesk told the Diablo 3 beta is likely to be like that in gold. I fully agree with him.Lavarinth wrote:Let's see... No AA yet, No Ultra settings yet, some still clear beta issues with sound including missing options, and bugs galore.. Oh, that's right, we're all playing and watching a beta, not a release.
You can't judge any of those aspects until the game's released.